1. Wolff, J. Concept of the Law of Bone Remodelling. In The Law of Bone Remodelling, Wolff, J., ed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg. 1986; p 1.  
2. Doyle, A. D.; Carvajal, N.; Jin, A.; Matsumoto, K.; Yamada, K. M. Local 3D matrix microenvironment regulates cell migration through spatiotemporal dynamics of contractility-dependent adhesions. Nat Commun. 2015, 6, 8720.  
3. Hadden, W. J.; Young, J. L.; Holle, A. W.; McFetridge, M. L.; Kim, D. Y.; Wijesinghe, P.; Taylor-Weiner, H.; Wen, J. H.; Lee, A. R.; Bieback, K.; Vo, B. N.; Sampson, D. D.; Kennedy, B. F.; Spatz, J. P.; Engler, A. J.; Choi, Y. S. Stem cell migration and mechanotransduction on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017, 114, 5647-5652.  
4. Mao, A. S.; Shin, J. W.; Mooney, D. J. Effects of substrate stiffness and cell-cell contact on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials. 2016, 98, 184-191.  
5. Nisenholz, N.; Rajendran, K.; Dang, Q.; Chen, H.; Kemkemer, R.; Krishnan, R.; Zemel, A. Active mechanics and dynamics of cell spreading on elastic substrates. Soft Matter. 2014, 10, 7234-7246.  
6. Shin, J. W.; Mooney, D. J. Extracellular matrix stiffness causes systematic variations in proliferation and chemosensitivity in myeloid leukemias. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016, 113, 12126-12131.  
7. Bonnans, C.; Chou, J.; Werb, Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 786-801.  
8. Handorf, A. M.; Zhou, Y.; Halanski, M. A.; Li, W. J. Tissue stiffness dictates development, homeostasis, and disease progression. Organogenesis. 2015, 11, 1-15.  
9. Chaudhuri, O. Viscoelastic hydrogels for 3D cell culture. Biomater Sci. 2017, 5, 1480-1490.  
10. Yang, Y.; Wang, K.; Gu, X.; Leong, K. W. Biophysical regulation of cell behavior—cross talk between substrate stiffness and nanotopography. Engineering (Beijing). 2017, 3, 36-54.  
11. Panciera, T.; Azzolin, L.; Cordenonsi, M.; Piccolo, S. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 758-770.  
12. Chaudhuri, O.; Cooper-White, J.; Janmey, P. A.; Mooney, D. J.; Shenoy, V. B. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature. 2020, 584, 535-546.  
13. Levental, I.; Georges, P. C.; Janmey, P. A. Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. Soft Matter. 2007, 3, 299-306.  
14. Vining, K. H.; Mooney, D. J. Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 728-742.  
15. Sharabi, M.; Wertheimer, S.; Wade, K. R.; Galbusera, F.; Benayahu, D.; Wilke, H. J.; Haj-Ali, R. Towards intervertebral disc engineering: Biomimetics of form and function of the annulus fibrosus lamellae. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019, 94, 298-307.  
16. Kleemann, R. U.; Krocker, D.; Cedraro, A.; Tuischer, J.; Duda, G. N. Altered cartilage mechanics and histology in knee osteoarthritis: relation to clinical assessment (ICRS Grade). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005, 13, 958-963.  
17. Zhang, X.; Cai, D.; Zhou, F.; Yu, J.; Wu, X.; Yu, D.; Zou, Y.; Hong, Y.; Yuan, C.; Chen, Y.; Pan, Z.; Bunpetch, V.; Sun, H.; An, C.; Yi-Chin, T.; Ouyang, H.; Zhang, S. Targeting downstream subcellular YAP activity as a function of matrix stiffness with Verteporfin-encapsulated chitosan microsphere attenuates osteoarthritis. Biomaterials. 2020, 232, 119724.  
18. Han, F.; Zhu, C.; Guo, Q.; Yang, H.; Li, B. Cellular modulation by the elasticity of biomaterials. J Mater Chem B. 2016, 4, 9-26.  
19. Sherratt, M. J. Tissue elasticity and the ageing elastic fibre. Age (Dordr). 2009, 31, 305-325.  
20. Engler, A. J.; Sen, S.; Sweeney, H. L.; Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006, 126, 677-689.  
21. Erickson, A. E.; Lan Levengood, S. K.; Sun, J.; Chang, F. C.; Zhang, M. Fabrication and characterization of chitosan-hyaluronic acid scaffolds with varying stiffness for glioblastoma cell culture. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018, 7, e1800295.  
22. Vorwald, C. E.; Gonzalez-Fernandez, T.; Joshee, S.; Sikorski, P.; Leach, J. K. Tunable fibrin-alginate interpenetrating network hydrogels to support cell spreading and network formation. Acta Biomater. 2020, 108, 142-152.  
23. Narkhede, A. A.; Crenshaw, J. H.; Manning, R. M.; Rao, S. S. The influence of matrix stiffness on the behavior of brain metastatic breast cancer cells in a biomimetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel platform. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018, 106, 1832-1841.  
24. Sun, Y.; Zhang, K.; Deng, R.; Ren, X.; Wu, C.; Li, J. Tunable stiffness of graphene oxide/polyacrylamide composite scaffolds regulates cytoskeleton assembly. Chem Sci. 2018, 9, 6516-6522.  
25. Corbin, E. A.; Vite, A.; Peyster, E. G.; Bhoopalam, M.; Brandimarto, J.; Wang, X.; Bennett, A. I.; Clark, A. T.; Cheng, X.; Turner, K. T.; Musunuru, K.; Margulies, K. B. Tunable and reversible substrate stiffness reveals a dynamic mechanosensitivity of cardiomyocytes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019, 11, 20603-20614.  
26. Mi, H. Y.; Jing, X.; Yilmaz, G.; Hagerty, B. S.; Enriquez, E.; Turng, L. S. In situ synthesis of polyurethane scaffolds with tunable properties by controlled crosslinking of tri-block copolymer and polycaprolactone triol for tissue regeneration. Chem Eng J. 2018, 348, 786-798.  
27. Buitrago, J. O.; Patel, K. D.; El-Fiqi, A.; Lee, J. H.; Kundu, B.; Lee, H. H.; Kim, H. W. Silk fibroin/collagen protein hybrid cell-encapsulating hydrogels with tunable gelation and improved physical and biological properties. Acta Biomater. 2018, 69, 218-233.  
28. Crocini, C.; Walker, C. J.; Anseth, K. S.; Leinwand, L. A. Three-dimensional encapsulation of adult mouse cardiomyocytes in hydrogels with tunable stiffness. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2020, 154, 71-79.  
29. Yi, B.; Shen, Y.; Tang, H.; Wang, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, Y. Stiffness of aligned fibers regulates the phenotypic expression of vascular smooth muscle cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019, 11, 6867-6880.  
30. Wu, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Fang, J.; Li, X.; Lin, Z.; Dai, G.; Yin, J.; Wei, P.; Zhang, D. The influence of the stiffness of GelMA substrate on the outgrowth of PC12 cells. Biosci Rep. 2019, 39, BSR20181748.  
31. Jiang, P.; Mao, Z.; Gao, C. Combinational effect of matrix elasticity and alendronate density on differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2015, 19, 76-84.  
32. Berger, A. J.; Linsmeier, K. M.; Kreeger, P. K.; Masters, K. S. Decoupling the effects of stiffness and fiber density on cellular behaviors via an interpenetrating network of gelatin-methacrylate and collagen. Biomaterials. 2017, 141, 125-135.  
33. Ansari, S.; Sarrion, P.; Hasani-Sadrabadi, M. M.; Aghaloo, T.; Wu, B. M.; Moshaverinia, A. Regulation of the fate of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells using engineered alginate-GelMA hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017, 105, 2957-2967.  
34. Ansari, S.; Chen, C.; Hasani-Sadrabadi, M. M.; Yu, B.; Zadeh, H. H.; Wu, B. M.; Moshaverinia, A. Hydrogel elasticity and microarchitecture regulate dental-derived mesenchymal stem cell-host immune system cross-talk. Acta Biomater. 2017, 60, 181-189.  
35. Wang, X.; Ding, Z.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Xu, H.; Lu, Q.; Kaplan, D. L. Bioactive silk hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties. J Mater Chem B. 2018, 6, 2739-2746.  
36. Zhu, C.; Li, J.; Liu, C.; Zhou, P.; Yang, H.; Li, B. Modulation of the gene expression of annulus fibrosus-derived stem cells using poly(ether carbonate urethane)urea scaffolds of tunable elasticity. Acta Biomater. 2016, 29, 228-238.  
37. Günay, K. A.; Ceccato, T. L.; Silver, J. S.; Bannister, K. L.; Bednarski, O. J.; Leinwand, L. A.; Anseth, K. S. PEG-anthracene hydrogels as an on-demand stiffening matrix to study mechanobiology. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2019, 58, 9912-9916.  
38. Young, J. L.; Engler, A. J. Hydrogels with time-dependent material properties enhance cardiomyocyte differentiation in vitro. Biomaterials. 2011, 32, 1002-1009.  
39. Fu, L.; Haage, A.; Kong, N.; Tanentzapf, G.; Li, H. Dynamic protein hydrogels with reversibly tunable stiffness regulate human lung fibroblast spreading reversibly. Chem Commun (Camb). 2019, 55, 5235-5238.  
40. Zhang, D.; Zhou, C.; Wang, Q.; Cai, L.; Du, W.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Xie, J. Extracellular matrix elasticity regulates osteocyte gap junction elongation: involvement of paxillin in intracellular signal transduction. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018, 51, 1013-1023.  
41. Xie, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Xu, J.; Zhao, H. Substrate stiffness-regulated matrix metalloproteinase output in myocardial cells and cardiac fibroblasts: implications for myocardial fibrosis. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 2463-2472.  
42. Yeung, T.; Georges, P. C.; Flanagan, L. A.; Marg, B.; Ortiz, M.; Funaki, M.; Zahir, N.; Ming, W.; Weaver, V.; Janmey, P. A. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2005, 60, 24-34.  
43. Hansen, T. D.; Koepsel, J. T.; Le, N. N.; Nguyen, E. H.; Zorn, S.; Parlato, M.; Loveland, S. G.; Schwartz, M. P.; Murphy, W. L. Biomaterial arrays with defined adhesion ligand densities and matrix stiffness identify distinct phenotypes for tumorigenic and nontumorigenic human mesenchymal cell types. Biomater Sci. 2014, 2, 745-756.  
44. Melica, M. E.; La Regina, G.; Parri, M.; Peired, A. J.; Romagnani, P.; Lasagni, L. Substrate stiffness modulates renal progenitor cell properties via a ROCK-mediated mechanotransduction mechanism. Cells. 2019, 8, 1561.  
45. Peyton, S. R.; Putnam, A. J. Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion. J Cell Physiol. 2005, 204, 198-209.  
46. Bangasser, B. L.; Shamsan, G. A.; Chan, C. E.; Opoku, K. N.; Tüzel, E.; Schlichtmann, B. W.; Kasim, J. A.; Fuller, B. J.; McCullough, B. R.; Rosenfeld, S. S.; Odde, D. J. Shifting the optimal stiffness for cell migration. Nat Commun. 2017, 8, 15313.  
47. Lo, C. M.; Wang, H. B.; Dembo, M.; Wang, Y. L. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J. 2000, 79, 144-152.  
48. Okimura, C.; Sakumura, Y.; Shimabukuro, K.; Iwadate, Y. Sensing of substratum rigidity and directional migration by fast-crawling cells. Phys Rev E. 2018, 97, 052401.  
49. Hartman, C. D.; Isenberg, B. C.; Chua, S. G.; Wong, J. Y. Vascular smooth muscle cell durotaxis depends on extracellular matrix composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016, 113, 11190-11195.  
50. Liu, N.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, Q.; Yong, L.; Zhang, T.; Tian, T.; Ma, Q.; Lin, S.; Zhu, B.; Cai, X. Effect of substrate stiffness on proliferation and differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2018, 51, e12478.  
51. Ansardamavandi, A.; Tafazzoli-Shadpour, M.; Shokrgozar, M. A. Behavioral remodeling of normal and cancerous epithelial cell lines with differing invasion potential induced by substrate elastic modulus. Cell Adh Migr. 2018, 12, 472-488.  
52. Leipzig, N. D.; Shoichet, M. S. The effect of substrate stiffness on adult neural stem cell behavior. Biomaterials. 2009, 30, 6867-6878.  
53. Robinson, K. G.; Nie, T.; Baldwin, A. D.; Yang, E. C.; Kiick, K. L.; Akins, R. E., Jr. Differential effects of substrate modulus on human vascular endothelial, smooth muscle, and fibroblastic cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012, 100, 1356-1367.  
54. Eroshenko, N.; Ramachandran, R.; Yadavalli, V. K.; Rao, R. R. Effect of substrate stiffness on early human embryonic stem cell differentiation. J Biol Eng. 2013, 7, 7.  
55. Arshi, A.; Nakashima, Y.; Nakano, H.; Eaimkhong, S.; Evseenko, D.; Reed, J.; Stieg, A. Z.; Gimzewski, J. K.; Nakano, A. Rigid microenvironments promote cardiac differentiation of mouse and human embryonic stem cells. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2013, 14, 025003.  
56. Macrí-Pellizzeri, L.; Pelacho, B.; Sancho, A.; Iglesias-García, O.; Simón-Yarza, A. M.; Soriano-Navarro, M.; González-Granero, S.; García-Verdugo, J. M.; De-Juan-Pardo, E. M.; Prosper, F. Substrate stiffness and composition specifically direct differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015, 21, 1633-1641.  
57. Fu, J.; Chuah, Y. J.; Liu, J.; Tan, S. Y.; Wang, D. A. Respective effects of gelatin-coated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates on self-renewal and cardiac differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018, 4, 4321-4330.  
58. Janmey, P. A.; Fletcher, D. A.; Reinhart-King, C. A. Stiffness sensing by cells. Physiol Rev. 2020, 100, 695-724.  
59. Lantoine, J.; Grevesse, T.; Villers, A.; Delhaye, G.; Mestdagh, C.; Versaevel, M.; Mohammed, D.; Bruyère, C.; Alaimo, L.; Lacour, S. P.; Ris, L.; Gabriele, S. Matrix stiffness modulates formation and activity of neuronal networks of controlled architectures. Biomaterials. 2016, 89, 14-24.  
60. Chen, G.; Dong, C.; Yang, L.; Lv, Y. 3D scaffolds with different stiffness but the same microstructure for bone tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015, 7, 15790-15802.  
61. Zhang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, H. The effect of matrix stiffness on biomechanical properties of chondrocytes. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2016, 48, 958-965.  
62. Sun, A. X.; Lin, H.; Fritch, M. R.; Shen, H.; Alexander, P. G.; DeHart, M.; Tuan, R. S. Chondrogenesis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in 3-dimensional, photocrosslinked hydrogel constructs: Effect of cell seeding density and material stiffness. Acta Biomater. 2017, 58, 302-311.  
63. Sarem, M.; Arya, N.; Heizmann, M.; Neffe, A. T.; Barbero, A.; Gebauer, T. P.; Martin, I.; Lendlein, A.; Shastri, V. P. Interplay between stiffness and degradation of architectured gelatin hydrogels leads to differential modulation of chondrogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2018, 69, 83-94.  
64. Zhan, X. Effect of matrix stiffness and adhesion ligand density on chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020, 108, 675-683.  
65. Takaza, M.; Moerman, K. M.; Gindre, J.; Lyons, G.; Simms, C. K. The anisotropic mechanical behaviour of passive skeletal muscle tissue subjected to large tensile strain. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013, 17, 209-220.  
66. Asbach, P.; Klatt, D.; Hamhaber, U.; Braun, J.; Somasundaram, R.; Hamm, B.; Sack, I. Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography. Magn Reson Med. 2008, 60, 373-379.  
67. Balleyguier, C.; Canale, S.; Ben Hassen, W.; Vielh, P.; Bayou, E. H.; Mathieu, M. C.; Uzan, C.; Bourgier, C.; Dromain, C. Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software. Eur J Radiol. 2013, 82, 427-434.  
68. Kearney, S. P.; Khan, A.; Dai, Z.; Royston, T. J. Dynamic viscoelastic models of human skin using optical elastography. Phys Med Biol. 2015, 60, 6975-6990.  
69. Yang, X.; Muthukumaran, P.; DasDe, S.; Teoh, S. H.; Choi, H.; Lim, S. K.; Lee, T. Positive alterations of viscoelastic and geometric properties in ovariectomized rat femurs with concurrent administration of ibandronate and PTH. Bone. 2013, 52, 308-317.  
70. Cameron, A. R.; Frith, J. E.; Cooper-White, J. J. The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype. Biomaterials. 2011, 32, 5979-5993.  
71. Charrier, E. E.; Pogoda, K.; Wells, R. G.; Janmey, P. A. Control of cell morphology and differentiation by substrates with independently tunable elasticity and viscous dissipation. Nat Commun. 2018, 9, 449.  
72. Chaudhuri, O.; Gu, L.; Darnell, M.; Klumpers, D.; Bencherif, S. A.; Weaver, J. C.; Huebsch, N.; Mooney, D. J. Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading. Nat Commun. 2015, 6, 6364.  
73. Chaudhuri, O.; Gu, L.; Klumpers, D.; Darnell, M.; Bencherif, S. A.; Weaver, J. C.; Huebsch, N.; Lee, H. P.; Lippens, E.; Duda, G. N.; Mooney, D. J. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater. 2016, 15, 326-334.  
74. Nam, S.; Stowers, R.; Lou, J.; Xia, Y.; Chaudhuri, O. Varying PEG density to control stress relaxation in alginate-PEG hydrogels for 3D cell culture studies. Biomaterials. 2019, 200, 15-24.  
75. Vining, K. H.; Stafford, A.; Mooney, D. J. Sequential modes of crosslinking tune viscoelasticity of cell-instructive hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2019, 188, 187-197.  
76. Nam, S.; Hu, K. H.; Butte, M. J.; Chaudhuri, O. Strain-enhanced stress relaxation impacts nonlinear elasticity in collagen gels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016, 113, 5492-5497.  
77. Rosales, A. M.; Rodell, C. B.; Chen, M. H.; Morrow, M. G.; Anseth, K. S.; Burdick, J. A. Reversible control of network properties in azobenzene-containing hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels. Bioconjug Chem. 2018, 29, 905-913.  
78. Marozas, I. A.; Anseth, K. S.; Cooper-White, J. J. Adaptable boronate ester hydrogels with tunable viscoelastic spectra to probe timescale dependent mechanotransduction. Biomaterials. 2019, 223, 119430.  
79. Tang, S.; Ma, H.; Tu, H. C.; Wang, H. R.; Lin, P. C.; Anseth, K. S. Adaptable fast relaxing boronate-based hydrogels for probing cell-matrix interactions. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2018, 5, 1800638.  
80. Hui, E.; Gimeno, K. I.; Guan, G.; Caliari, S. R. Spatiotemporal control of viscoelasticity in phototunable hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2019, 20, 4126-4134.  
81. Lou, J.; Stowers, R.; Nam, S.; Xia, Y.; Chaudhuri, O. Stress relaxing hyaluronic acid-collagen hydrogels promote cell spreading, fiber remodeling, and focal adhesion formation in 3D cell culture. Biomaterials. 2018, 154, 213-222.  
82. Sánchez-Morán, H.; Ahmadi, A.; Vogler, B.; Roh, K. H. Oxime cross-linked alginate hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation. Biomacromolecules. 2019, 20, 4419-4429.  
83. McKinnon, D. D.; Domaille, D. W.; Cha, J. N.; Anseth, K. S. Biophysically defined and cytocompatible covalently adaptable networks as viscoelastic 3D cell culture systems. Adv Mater. 2014, 26, 865-872.  
84. Brown, T. E.; Carberry, B. J.; Worrell, B. T.; Dudaryeva, O. Y.; McBride, M. K.; Bowman, C. N.; Anseth, K. S. Photopolymerized dynamic hydrogels with tunable viscoelastic properties through thioester exchange. Biomaterials. 2018, 178, 496-503.  
85. Loebel, C.; Ayoub, A.; Galarraga, J. H.; Kossover, O.; Simaan-Yameen, H.; Seliktar, D.; Burdick, J. A. Tailoring supramolecular guest-host hydrogel viscoelasticity with covalent fibrinogen double networks. J Mater Chem B. 2019, 7, 1753-1760.  
86. Zhao, X.; Huebsch, N.; Mooney, D. J.; Suo, Z. Stress-relaxation behavior in gels with ionic and covalent crosslinks. J Appl Phys. 2010, 107, 63509.  
87. Lee, H. P.; Gu, L.; Mooney, D. J.; Levenston, M. E.; Chaudhuri, O. Mechanical confinement regulates cartilage matrix formation by chondrocytes. Nat Mater. 2017, 16, 1243-1251.  
88. Ryan, A. J.; O’Brien, F. J. Insoluble elastin reduces collagen scaffold stiffness, improves viscoelastic properties, and induces a contractile phenotype in smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials. 2015, 73, 296-307.  
89. Bauer, A.; Gu, L.; Kwee, B.; Li, W. A.; Dellacherie, M.; Celiz, A. D.; Mooney, D. J. Hydrogel substrate stress-relaxation regulates the spreading and proliferation of mouse myoblasts. Acta Biomater. 2017, 62, 82-90.  
90. Zheng, J. Y.; Han, S. P.; Chiu, Y. J.; Yip, A. K.; Boichat, N.; Zhu, S. W.; Zhong, J.; Matsudaira, P. Epithelial monolayers coalesce on a viscoelastic substrate through redistribution of vinculin. Biophys J. 2017, 113, 1585-1598.  
91. Sommerfeld, S. D.; Elisseeff, J. H. Time to relax: mechanical stress release guides stem cell responses. Cell Stem Cell. 2016, 18, 166-167.  
92. Ghosh, P.; Rameshbabu, A. P.; Dhara, S. Citrate cross-linked gels with strain reversibility and viscoelastic behavior accelerate healing of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model. Langmuir. 2014, 30, 8442-8451.  
93. Ghosh, P.; Rameshbabu, A. P.; Das, D.; Francis, N. K.; Pawar, H. S.; Subramanian, B.; Pal, S.; Dhara, S. Covalent cross-links in polyampholytic chitosan fibers enhances bone regeneration in a rabbit model. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015, 125, 160-169.  
94. Darnell, M.; Young, S.; Gu, L.; Shah, N.; Lippens, E.; Weaver, J.; Duda, G.; Mooney, D. Substrate stress-relaxation regulates scaffold remodeling and bone formation in vivo. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017, 6, 1601185.  
95. Richardson, B. M.; Wilcox, D. G.; Randolph, M. A.; Anseth, K. S. Hydrazone covalent adaptable networks modulate extracellular matrix deposition for cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2019, 83, 71-82.  
96. Li, W.; Wu, D.; Hu, D.; Zhu, S.; Pan, C.; Jiao, Y.; Li, L.; Luo, B.; Zhou, C.; Lu, L. Stress-relaxing double-network hydrogel for chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020, 107, 110333.  
97. Mandal, K.; Gong, Z.; Rylander, A.; Shenoy, V. B.; Janmey, P. A. Opposite responses of normal hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma cells to substrate viscoelasticity. Biomater Sci. 2020, 8, 1316-1328.  
98. Chen, J.; Wright, K. E.; Birch, M. A. Nanoscale viscoelastic properties and adhesion of polydimethylsiloxane for tissue engineering. Acta Mech Sin. 2014, 30, 2-6.  
99. Trappmann, B.; Gautrot, J. E.; Connelly, J. T.; Strange, D. G.; Li, Y.; Oyen, M. L.; Cohen Stuart, M. A.; Boehm, H.; Li, B.; Vogel, V.; Spatz, J. P.; Watt, F. M.; Huck, W. T. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat Mater. 2012, 11, 642-649.  
100. Wen, J. H.; Vincent, L. G.; Fuhrmann, A.; Choi, Y. S.; Hribar, K. C.; Taylor-Weiner, H.; Chen, S.; Engler, A. J. Interplay of matrix stiffness and protein tethering in stem cell differentiation. Nat Mater. 2014, 13, 979-987.  
101. Sadtler, K.; Wolf, M. T.; Ganguly, S.; Moad, C. A.; Chung, L.; Majumdar, S.; Housseau, F.; Pardoll, D. M.; Elisseeff, J. H. Divergent immune responses to synthetic and biological scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2019, 192, 405-415.  
102. Chu, G.; Yuan, Z.; Zhu, C.; Zhou, P.; Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Cai, Y.; Zhu, X.; Yang, H.; Li, B. Substrate stiffness- and topography-dependent differentiation of annulus fibrosus-derived stem cells is regulated by Yes-associated protein. Acta Biomater. 2019, 92, 254-264.  
103. Shvedova, A. A.; Kisin, E. R.; Mercer, R.; Murray, A. R.; Johnson, V. J.; Potapovich, A. I.; Tyurina, Y. Y.; Gorelik, O.; Arepalli, S.; Schwegler-Berry, D.; Hubbs, A. F.; Antonini, J.; Evans, D. E.; Ku, B. K.; Ramsey, D.; Maynard, A.; Kagan, V. E.; Castranova, V.; Baron, P. Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005, 289, L698-708.  
104. Suki, B.; Sato, S.; Parameswaran, H.; Szabari, M. V.; Takahashi, A.; Bartolák-Suki, E. Emphysema and mechanical stress-induced lung remodeling. Physiology (Bethesda). 2013, 28, 404-413.  
105. Nguyen, A. T.; Sathe, S. R.; Yim, E. K. From nano to micro: topographical scale and its impact on cell adhesion, morphology and contact guidance. J Phys Condens Matter. 2016, 28, 183001.  
106. Wu, S.; Duan, B.; Qin, X.; Butcher, J. T. Living nano-micro fibrous woven fabric/hydrogel composite scaffolds for heart valve engineering. Acta Biomater. 2017, 51, 89-100.  
107. Wang, S.; Zhong, S.; Lim, C. T.; Nie, H. Effects of fiber alignment on stem cells-fibrous scaffold interactions. J Mater Chem B. 2015, 3, 3358-3366.  
108. Fu, X.; Wang, H. Spatial arrangement of polycaprolactone/collagen nanofiber scaffolds regulates the wound healing related behaviors of human adipose stromal cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012, 18, 631-642.  
109. Moffa, M.; Sciancalepore, A. G.; Passione, L. G.; Pisignano, D. Combined nano- and micro-scale topographic cues for engineered vascular constructs by electrospinning and imprinted micro-patterns. Small. 2014, 10, 2439-2450.  
110. Yan, J.; Qiang, L.; Gao, Y.; Cui, X.; Zhou, H.; Zhong, S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H. Effect of fiber alignment in electrospun scaffolds on keratocytes and corneal epithelial cells behavior. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012, 100, 527-535.  
111. Stevens, M. M.; George, J. H. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science. 2005, 310, 1135-1138.  
112. Dalby, M. J.; Gadegaard, N.; Oreffo, R. O. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nat Mater. 2014, 13, 558-569.  
113. Hou, Y.; Yu, L.; Xie, W.; Camacho, L. C.; Zhang, M.; Chu, Z.; Wei, Q.; Haag, R. Surface roughness and substrate stiffness synergize to drive cellular mechanoresponse. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 748-757.  
114. Jahanmard, F.; Baghban Eslaminejad, M.; Amani-Tehran, M.; Zarei, F.; Rezaei, N.; Croes, M.; Amin Yavari, S. Incorporation of F-MWCNTs into electrospun nanofibers regulates osteogenesis through stiffness and nanotopography. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020, 106, 110163.  
115. Qu, F.; Guilak, F.; Mauck, R. L. Cell migration: implications for repair and regeneration in joint disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019, 15, 167-179.  
116. Liu, W.; Thomopoulos, S.; Xia, Y. Electrospun nanofibers for regenerative medicine. Adv Healthc Mater. 2012, 1, 10-25.  

117. Song, K. H.; Heo, S. J.; Peredo, A. P.; Davidson, M. D.; Mauck, R. L.; Burdick, J. A. Influence of fiber stiffness on meniscal cell migration into dense fibrous networks. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020, 9, e1901228.  
118. Davidson, M. D.; Song, K. H.; Lee, M. H.; Llewellyn, J.; Du, Y.; Baker, B. M.; Wells, R. G.; Burdick, J. A. Engineered fibrous networks to investigate the influence of fiber mechanics on myofibroblast differentiation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019, 5, 3899-3908.  
119. Northey, J. J.; Przybyla, L.; Weaver, V. M. Tissue force programs cell fate and tumor aggression. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 1224-1237.  
120. Brusatin, G.; Panciera, T.; Gandin, A.; Citron, A.; Piccolo, S. Biomaterials and engineered microenvironments to control YAP/TAZ-dependent cell behaviour. Nat Mater. 2018, 17, 1063-1075.  
121. Hove, J. R.; Köster, R. W.; Forouhar, A. S.; Acevedo-Bolton, G.; Fraser, S. E.; Gharib, M. Intracardiac fluid forces are an essential epigenetic factor for embryonic cardiogenesis. Nature. 2003, 421, 172-177.  
122. Yang, Y.; Beqaj, S.; Kemp, P.; Ariel, I.; Schuger, L. Stretch-induced alternative splicing of serum response factor promotes bronchial myogenesis and is defective in lung hypoplasia. J Clin Invest. 2000, 106, 1321-1330.  
123. Lefebvre, V.; Bhattaram, P. Vertebrate skeletogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2010, 90, 291-317.  
124. Ni, S.; Ling, Z.; Wang, X.; Cao, Y.; Wu, T.; Deng, R.; Crane, J. L.; Skolasky, R.; Demehri, S.; Zhen, G.; Jain, A.; Wu, P.; Pan, D.; Hu, B.; Lyu, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Qi, H.; Guan, Y.; Dong, X.; Wan, M.; Zou, X.; Lu, H.; Hu, J.; Cao, X. Sensory innervation in porous endplates by Netrin-1 from osteoclasts mediates PGE2-induced spinal hypersensitivity in mice. Nat Commun. 2019, 10, 5643.  
125. Lacroix, D.; Prendergast, P. J. A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. J Biomech. 2002, 35, 1163-1171.  
126. Meza, D.; Musmacker, B.; Steadman, E.; Stransky, T.; Rubenstein, D. A.; Yin, W. Endothelial cell biomechanical responses are dependent on both fluid shear stress and tensile strain. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2019, 12, 311-325.  
127. Gayer, C. P.; Basson, M. D. The effects of mechanical forces on intestinal physiology and pathology. Cell Signal. 2009, 21, 1237-1244.  
128. Madhavan, S.; Anghelina, M.; Rath-Deschner, B.; Wypasek, E.; John, A.; Deschner, J.; Piesco, N.; Agarwal, S. Biomechanical signals exert sustained attenuation of proinflammatory gene induction in articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006, 14, 1023-1032.  
129. Sowa, G.; Agarwal, S. Cyclic tensile stress exerts a protective effect on intervertebral disc cells. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008, 87, 537-544.  
130. Branski, R. C.; Perera, P.; Verdolini, K.; Rosen, C. A.; Hebda, P. A.; Agarwal, S. Dynamic biomechanical strain inhibits IL-1beta-induced inflammation in vocal fold fibroblasts. J Voice. 2007, 21, 651-660.  
131. Zhao, R.; Liu, W.; Xia, T.; Yang, L. Disordered mechanical stress and tissue engineering therapies in intervertebral disc degeneration. Polymers (Basel). 2019, 11, 1151.  
132. Pratsinis, H.; Papadopoulou, A.; Neidlinger-Wilke, C.; Brayda-Bruno, M.; Wilke, H. J.; Kletsas, D. Cyclic tensile stress of human annulus fibrosus cells induces MAPK activation: involvement in proinflammatory gene expression. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016, 24, 679-687.  
133. Yurube, T.; Hirata, H.; Kakutani, K.; Maeno, K.; Takada, T.; Zhang, Z.; Takayama, K.; Matsushita, T.; Kuroda, R.; Kurosaka, M.; Nishida, K. Notochordal cell disappearance and modes of apoptotic cell death in a rat tail static compression-induced disc degeneration model. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014, 16, R31.  
134. Chang, S. H.; Mori, D.; Kobayashi, H.; Mori, Y.; Nakamoto, H.; Okada, K.; Taniguchi, Y.; Sugita, S.; Yano, F.; Chung, U. I.; Kim-Kaneyama, J. R.; Yanagita, M.; Economides, A.; Canalis, E.; Chen, D.; Tanaka, S.; Saito, T. Excessive mechanical loading promotes osteoarthritis through the gremlin-1-NF-κB pathway. Nat Commun. 2019, 10, 1442.  
135. Yanoshita, M.; Hirose, N.; Okamoto, Y.; Sumi, C.; Takano, M.; Nishiyama, S.; Asakawa-Tanne, Y.; Horie, K.; Onishi, A.; Yamauchi, Y.; Mitsuyoshi, T.; Kunimatsu, R.; Tanimoto, K. Cyclic tensile strain upregulates pro-inflammatory cytokine expression via FAK-MAPK signaling in chondrocytes. Inflammation. 2018, 41, 1621-1630.  
136. Hirose, N.; Okamoto, Y.; Yanoshita, M.; Asakawa, Y.; Sumi, C.; Takano, M.; Nishiyama, S.; Su, S. C.; Mitsuyoshi, T.; Kunimatsu, R.; Tanne, K.; Tanimoto, K. Protective effects of cilengitide on inflammation in chondrocytes under excessive mechanical stress. Cell Biol Int. 2020, 44, 966-974.  
137. Hunt, B. J.; Jurd, K. M. Endothelial cell activation. A central pathophysiological process. BMJ. 1998, 316, 1328-1329.  
138. Chatterjee, S.; Browning, E. A.; Hong, N.; DeBolt, K.; Sorokina, E. M.; Liu, W.; Birnbaum, M. J.; Fisher, A. B. Membrane depolarization is the trigger for PI3K/Akt activation and leads to the generation of ROS. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012, 302, H105-114.  
139. Hynes, R. O. Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell. 1992, 69, 11-25.  
140. Guan, J. L. Integrin signaling through FAK in the regulation of mammary stem cells and breast cancer. IUBMB Life. 2010, 62, 268-276.  
141. Bolós, V.; Gasent, J. M.; López-Tarruella, S.; Grande, E. The dual kinase complex FAK-Src as a promising therapeutic target in cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2010, 3, 83-97.  
142. Liu, C.; Luo, J. W.; Liang, T.; Lin, L. X.; Luo, Z. P.; Zhuang, Y. Q.; Sun, Y. L. Matrix stiffness regulates the differentiation of tendon-derived stem cells through FAK-ERK1/2 activation. Exp Cell Res. 2018, 373, 62-70.  
143. Lee, H. J.; Li, N.; Evans, S. M.; Diaz, M. F.; Wenzel, P. L. Biomechanical force in blood development: extrinsic physical cues drive pro-hematopoietic signaling. Differentiation. 2013, 86, 92-103.  
144. Biggs, M. J.; Richards, R. G.; Gadegaard, N.; Wilkinson, C. D.; Oreffo, R. O.; Dalby, M. J. The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2009, 30, 5094-5103.  
145. Teo, B. K.; Wong, S. T.; Lim, C. K.; Kung, T. Y.; Yap, C. H.; Ramagopal, Y.; Romer, L. H.; Yim, E. K. Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase. ACS Nano. 2013, 7, 4785-4798.  
146. Khatiwala, C. B.; Kim, P. D.; Peyton, S. R.; Putnam, A. J. ECM compliance regulates osteogenesis by influencing MAPK signaling downstream of RhoA and ROCK. J Bone Miner Res. 2009, 24, 886-898.  
147. Halder, G.; Dupont, S.; Piccolo, S. Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 591-600.  
148. Dasgupta, I.; McCollum, D. Control of cellular responses to mechanical cues through YAP/TAZ regulation. J Biol Chem. 2019, 294, 17693-17706.  
149. Du, J.; Chen, X.; Liang, X.; Zhang, G.; Xu, J.; He, L.; Zhan, Q.; Feng, X. Q.; Chien, S.; Yang, C. Integrin activation and internalization on soft ECM as a mechanism of induction of stem cell differentiation by ECM elasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108, 9466-9471.  
150. Coste, B.; Mathur, J.; Schmidt, M.; Earley, T. J.; Ranade, S.; Petrus, M. J.; Dubin, A. E.; Patapoutian, A. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science. 2010, 330, 55-60.  
151. Pethő, Z.; Najder, K.; Bulk, E.; Schwab, A. Mechanosensitive ion channels push cancer progression. Cell Calcium. 2019, 80, 79-90.  
152. Caliari, S. R.; Vega, S. L.; Kwon, M.; Soulas, E. M.; Burdick, J. A. Dimensionality and spreading influence MSC YAP/TAZ signaling in hydrogel environments. Biomaterials. 2016, 103, 314-323.  
153. Cameron, A. R.; Frith, J. E.; Gomez, G. A.; Yap, A. S.; Cooper-White, J. J. The effect of time-dependent deformation of viscoelastic hydrogels on myogenic induction and Rac1 activity in mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2014, 35, 1857-1868.  
154. Yim, E. K.; Darling, E. M.; Kulangara, K.; Guilak, F.; Leong, K. W. Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2010, 31, 1299-1306.  
155. Mascharak, S.; Benitez, P. L.; Proctor, A. C.; Madl, C. M.; Hu, K. H.; Dewi, R. E.; Butte, M. J.; Heilshorn, S. C. YAP-dependent mechanotransduction is required for proliferation and migration on native-like substrate topography. Biomaterials. 2017, 115, 155-166.  
156. Cui, Y.; Hameed, F. M.; Yang, B.; Lee, K.; Pan, C. Q.; Park, S.; Sheetz, M. Cyclic stretching of soft substrates induces spreading and growth. Nat Commun. 2015, 6, 6333.  
157. Wang, L.; Luo, J. Y.; Li, B.; Tian, X. Y.; Chen, L. J.; Huang, Y.; Liu, J.; Deng, D.; Lau, C. W.; Wan, S.; Ai, D.; Mak, K. K.; Tong, K. K.; Kwan, K. M.; Wang, N.; Chiu, J. J.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, Y. Integrin-YAP/TAZ-JNK cascade mediates atheroprotective effect of unidirectional shear flow. Nature. 2016, 540, 579-582.  
158. Pathak, M. M.; Nourse, J. L.; Tran, T.; Hwe, J.; Arulmoli, J.; Le, D. T.; Bernardis, E.; Flanagan, L. A.; Tombola, F. Stretch-activated ion channel Piezo1 directs lineage choice in human neural stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014, 111, 16148-16153.  
159. Niepel, M. S.; Ekambaram, B. K.; Schmelzer, C. E. H.; Groth, T. Polyelectrolyte multilayers of poly (l-lysine) and hyaluronic acid on nanostructured surfaces affect stem cell response. Nanoscale. 2019, 11, 2878-2891.  
160. Yao, S.; Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Wu, Q.; Sun, X.; Mao, H. Co-effects of matrix low elasticity and aligned topography on stem cell neurogenic differentiation and rapid neurite outgrowth. Nanoscale. 2016, 8, 10252-10265.  
161. Frank, V.; Kaufmann, S.; Wright, R.; Horn, P.; Yoshikawa, H. Y.; Wuchter, P.; Madsen, J.; Lewis, A. L.; Armes, S. P.; Ho, A. D.; Tanaka, M. Frequent mechanical stress suppresses proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow without loss of multipotency. Sci Rep. 2016, 6, 24264.  
162. Tan, S.; Fang, J. Y.; Yang, Z.; Nimni, M. E.; Han, B. The synergetic effect of hydrogel stiffness and growth factor on osteogenic differentiation. Biomaterials. 2014, 35, 5294-5306.  
163. Grinnell, F.; Ho, C. H. The effect of growth factor environment on fibroblast morphological response to substrate stiffness. Biomaterials. 2013, 34, 965-974.  
164. Chen, C.; Xie, J.; Deng, L.; Yang, L. Substrate stiffness together with soluble factors affects chondrocyte mechanoresponses. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014, 6, 16106-16116.  
165. Chang, H.; Liu, X. Q.; Hu, M.; Zhang, H.; Li, B. C.; Ren, K. F.; Boudou, T.; Albiges-Rizo, C.; Picart, C.; Ji, J. Substrate stiffness combined with hepatocyte growth factor modulates endothelial cell behavior. Biomacromolecules. 2016, 17, 2767-2776.  
166. Wang, J.; Tian, L.; Chen, N.; Ramakrishna, S.; Mo, X. The cellular response of nerve cells on poly-L-lysine coated PLGA-MWCNTs aligned nanofibers under electrical stimulation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018, 91, 715-726.  
167. Li, Q.; Zhang, B.; Kasoju, N.; Ma, J.; Yang, A.; Cui, Z.; Wang, H.; Ye, H. Differential and interactive effects of substrate topography and chemistry on human mesenchymal stem cell gene expression. Int J Mol Sci. 2018, 19, 2344.  
168. Yamamoto, S.; Okada, K.; Sasaki, N.; Chang, A. C.; Yamaguchi, K.; Nakanishi, J. Photoactivatable hydrogel interfaces for resolving the interplay of chemical, mechanical, and geometrical regulation of collective cell migration. Langmuir. 2019, 35, 7459-7468.  
169. Li, J.; Kwiatkowska, B.; Lu, H.; Voglstätter, M.; Ueda, E.; Grunze, M.; Sleeman, J.; Levkin, P. A.; Nazarenko, I. Collaborative action of surface chemistry and topography in the regulation of mesenchymal and epithelial markers and the shape of cancer cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016, 8, 28554-28565.