Mechanically conditioned cell sheets cultured on thermo-responsive surfaces promote bone regeneration
Cell sheet–based scaffold–free technology holds promise for tissue engineering applications and has been extensively explored during the past decades. However, efficient harvest and handling of cell sheets remain challenging, including insufficient extracellular matrix content and poor mechanical strength. Mechanical loading has been widely used to enhance extracellular matrix production in a variety of cell types. However, currently, there are no effective ways to apply mechanical loading to cell sheets. In this study, we prepared thermo–responsive elastomer substrates by grafting poly(N–isopropyl acrylamide) (PNIPAAm) to poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) surfaces. The effect of PNIPAAm grafting yields on cell behaviours was investigated to optimize surfaces suitable for cell sheet culturing and harvesting. Subsequently, MC3T3–E1 cells were cultured on the PDMS–g–PNIPAAm substrates under mechanical stimulation by cyclically stretching the substrates. Upon maturation, the cell sheets were harvested by lowering the temperature. We found that the extracellular matrix content and thickness of cell sheet were markedly elevated upon appropriate mechanical conditioning. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analyses further confirmed that the expression of osteogenic–specific genes and major matrix components were up–regulated. After implantation into the critical–sized calvarial defects of mice, the mechanically conditioned cell sheets significantly promoted new bone formation. Findings from this study reveal that thermo–responsive elastomer, together with mechanical conditioning, can potentially be applied to prepare high–quality cell sheets for bone tissue engineering.
Below is the content of the Citations in the paper which has been de-formatted, however, the content stays consistent with the original.
1. Green, J. J.; Elisseeff, J. H. Mimicking biological functionality with polymers for biomedical applications. Nature. 2016, 540, 386-394.
2. Triffitt, J. T.; Wang, Q. Application of stem cells in translational medicine. Biomater Transl. 2021, 2, 285-286.
3. Steijvers, E.; Ghei, A.; Xia, Z. Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective. Biomater Transl. 2022, 3, 65-80.
4. Han, F.; Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Gong, J.; Guo, Q.; Zhu, C.; Zhu, X.; Yang, H.; Li, B. In situ silk fibroin-mediated crystal formation of octacalcium phosphate and its application in bone repair. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019, 95, 1-10.
5. Burg, K. J.; Porter, S.; Kellam, J. F. Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2000, 21, 2347-2359.
6. Zhang, K.; Wang, S.; Zhou, C.; Cheng, L.; Gao, X.; Xie, X.; Sun, J.; Wang, H.; Weir, M. D.; Reynolds, M. A.; Zhang, N.; Bai, Y.; Xu, H. H. K. Advanced smart biomaterials and constructs for hard tissue engineering and regeneration. Bone Res. 2018, 6, 31.
7. Xu, Y.; Peng, J.; Richards, G.; Lu, S.; Eglin, D. Optimization of electrospray fabrication of stem cell-embedded alginate-gelatin microspheres and their assembly in 3D-printed poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J Orthop Translat. 2019, 18, 128-141.
8. Rafat, M.; Li, F.; Fagerholm, P.; Lagali, N. S.; Watsky, M. A.; Munger, R.; Matsuura, T.; Griffith, M. PEG-stabilized carbodiimide crosslinked collagen-chitosan hydrogels for corneal tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008, 29, 3960-3972.
9. Kumbar, S. G.; Nukavarapu, S. P.; James, R.; Nair, L. S.; Laurencin, C. T. Electrospun poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008, 29, 4100-4107.
10. Chouhan, D.; Mandal, B. B. Silk biomaterials in wound healing and skin regeneration therapeutics: from bench to bedside. Acta Biomater. 2020, 103, 24-51.
11. Xuan, H.; Hu, H.; Geng, C.; Song, J.; Shen, Y.; Lei, D.; Guan, Q.; Zhao, S.; You, Z. Biofunctionalized chondrogenic shape-memory ternary scaffolds for efficient cell-free cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2020, 105, 97-110.
12. Castilho, M.; Mouser, V.; Chen, M.; Malda, J.; Ito, K. Bi-layered micro-fibre reinforced hydrogels for articular cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2019, 95, 297-306.
13. Bhatia, S. N.; Underhill, G. H.; Zaret, K. S.; Fox, I. J. Cell and tissue engineering for liver disease. Sci Transl Med. 2014, 6, 245sr242.
14. Sabetkish, S.; Kajbafzadeh, A. M.; Sabetkish, N.; Khorramirouz, R.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Seyedian, S. L.; Pasalar, P.; Orangian, S.; Beigi, R. S.; Aryan, Z.; Akbari, H.; Tavangar, S. M. Whole-organ tissue engineering: decellularization and recellularization of three-dimensional matrix liver scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015, 103, 1498-1508.
15. Shimizu, T.; Yamato, M.; Kikuchi, A.; Okano, T. Cell sheet engineering for myocardial tissue reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2003, 24, 2309-2316.
16. Qazi, T. H.; Mooney, D. J.; Pumberger, M.; Geissler, S.; Duda, G. N. Biomaterials based strategies for skeletal muscle tissue engineering: existing technologies and future trends. Biomaterials. 2015, 53, 502-521.
17. Pedde, R. D.; Mirani, B.; Navaei, A.; Styan, T.; Wong, S.; Mehrali, M.; Thakur, A.; Mohtaram, N. K.; Bayati, A.; Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A.; Nikkhah, M.; Willerth, S. M.; Akbari, M. Emerging biofabrication strategies for engineering complex tissue constructs. Adv Mater. 2017, 29, 1606061.
18. Yang, J.; Yamato, M.; Kohno, C.; Nishimoto, A.; Sekine, H.; Fukai, F.; Okano, T. Cell sheet engineering: recreating tissues without biodegradable scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005, 26, 6415-6422.
19. Yamato, M.; Okano, T. Cell sheet engineering. Mater Today. 2004, 7, 42-47.
20. Xu, X.; Song, J. Segmental long bone regeneration guided by degradable synthetic polymeric scaffolds. Biomater Transl. 2020, 1, 33-45.
21. McMurray, R. J.; Gadegaard, N.; Tsimbouri, P. M.; Burgess, K. V.; McNamara, L. E.; Tare, R.; Murawski, K.; Kingham, E.; Oreffo, R. O.; Dalby, M. J. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat Mater. 2011, 10, 637-644.
22. Kelm, J. M.; Fussenegger, M. Scaffold-free cell delivery for use in regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010, 62, 753-764.
23. Badylak, S. F.; Gilbert, T. W. Immune response to biologic scaffold materials. Semin Immunol. 2008, 20, 109-116.
24. Anderson, J. M.; Rodriguez, A.; Chang, D. T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008, 20, 86-100.
25. Akizuki, T.; Oda, S.; Komaki, M.; Tsuchioka, H.; Kawakatsu, N.; Kikuchi, A.; Yamato, M.; Okano, T.; Ishikawa, I. Application of periodontal ligament cell sheet for periodontal regeneration: a pilot study in beagle dogs. J Periodontal Res. 2005, 40, 245-251.
26. L’Heureux, N.; Dusserre, N.; Konig, G.; Victor, B.; Keire, P.; Wight, T. N.; Chronos, N. A.; Kyles, A. E.; Gregory, C. R.; Hoyt, G.; Robbins, R. C.; McAllister, T. N. Human tissue-engineered blood vessels for adult arterial revascularization. Nat Med. 2006, 12, 361-365.
27. Nishida, K.; Yamato, M.; Hayashida, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Maeda, N.; Watanabe, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Nagai, S.; Kikuchi, A.; Tano, Y.; Okano, T. Functional bioengineered corneal epithelial sheet grafts from corneal stem cells expanded ex vivo on a temperature-responsive cell culture surface. Transplantation. 2004, 77, 379-385.
28. Matsuura, K.; Masuda, S.; Haraguchi, Y.; Yasuda, N.; Shimizu, T.; Hagiwara, N.; Zandstra, P. W.; Okano, T. Creation of mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiac cell sheets. Biomaterials. 2011, 32, 7355-7362.
29. Doberenz, F.; Zeng, K.; Willems, C.; Zhang, K.; Groth, T. Thermoresponsive polymers and their biomedical application in tissue engineering - a review. J Mater Chem B. 2020, 8, 607-628.
30. Yamato, M.; Utsumi, M.; Kushida, A.; Konno, C.; Kikuchi, A.; Okano, T. Thermo-responsive culture dishes allow the intact harvest of multilayered keratinocyte sheets without dispase by reducing temperature. Tissue Eng. 2001, 7, 473-480.
31. Lin, J. B.; Isenberg, B. C.; Shen, Y.; Schorsch, K.; Sazonova, O. V.; Wong, J. Y. Thermo-responsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) grafted onto microtextured poly(dimethylsiloxane) for aligned cell sheet engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2012, 99, 108-115.
32. Yu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhou, F.; Wu, Z.; Huang, H.; Brash, J. L. Protein adsorption and cell adhesion/detachment behavior on dual-responsive silicon surfaces modified with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-block-polystyrene copolymer. Langmuir. 2010, 26, 8582-8588.
33. Kushida, A.; Yamato, M.; Konno, C.; Kikuchi, A.; Sakurai, Y.; Okano, T. Decrease in culture temperature releases monolayer endothelial cell sheets together with deposited fibronectin matrix from temperature-responsive culture surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999, 45, 355-362.
34. Hamdi, H.; Furuta, A.; Bellamy, V.; Bel, A.; Puymirat, E.; Peyrard, S.; Agbulut, O.; Menasché, P. Cell delivery: intramyocardial injections or epicardial deposition? A head-to-head comparison. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009, 87, 1196-1203.
35. Shimizu, T.; Sekine, H.; Yang, J.; Isoi, Y.; Yamato, M.; Kikuchi, A.; Kobayashi, E.; Okano, T. Polysurgery of cell sheet grafts overcomes diffusion limits to produce thick, vascularized myocardial tissues. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 708-710.
36. Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, S.; Zhang, T.; Chen, C.; Hu, J.; Sun, D.; Lu, H. Mechanical stimulation improves rotator cuff tendon-bone healing via activating IL-4/JAK/STAT signaling pathway mediated macrophage M2 polarization. J Orthop Translat. 2022, 37, 78-88.
37. Lin, C. Y.; Song, X.; Seaman, K.; You, L. Microfluidic co-culture platforms for studying osteocyte regulation of other cell types under dynamic mechanical stimulation. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2022, 20, 478-492.
38. Zhang, J.; Hao, X.; Chi, R.; Qi, J.; Xu, T. Moderate mechanical stress suppresses the IL-1β-induced chondrocyte apoptosis by regulating mitochondrial dynamics. J Cell Physiol. 2021, 236, 7504-7515.
39. Lee, H. P.; Gu, L.; Mooney, D. J.; Levenston, M. E.; Chaudhuri, O. Mechanical confinement regulates cartilage matrix formation by chondrocytes. Nat Mater. 2017, 16, 1243-1251.
40. Wang, T.; Chen, P.; Chen, L.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, A.; Zheng, Q.; Mitchell, C. A.; Leys, T.; Tuan, R. S.; Zheng, M. H. Reduction of mechanical loading in tendons induces heterotopic ossification and activation of the β-catenin signaling pathway. J Orthop Translat. 2021, 29, 42-50.
41. Guilak, F. Biomechanical factors in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011, 25, 815-823.
42. Ni, R.; Guo, X. E.; Yan, C.; Wen, C. Hemodynamic stress shapes subchondral bone in osteoarthritis: An emerging hypothesis. J Orthop Translat. 2022, 32, 85-90.
43. Gauvin, R.; Parenteau-Bareil, R.; Larouche, D.; Marcoux, H.; Bisson, F.; Bonnet, A.; Auger, F. A.; Bolduc, S.; Germain, L. Dynamic mechanical stimulations induce anisotropy and improve the tensile properties of engineered tissues produced without exogenous scaffolding. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 3294-3301.
44. Dai, Z. Q.; Wang, R.; Ling, S. K.; Wan, Y. M.; Li, Y. H. Simulated microgravity inhibits the proliferation and osteogenesis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2007, 40, 671-684.
45. Vandenburgh, H. H. Dynamic mechanical orientation of skeletal myofibers in vitro. Dev Biol. 1982, 93, 438-443.
46. Vandenburgh, H. H.; Swasdison, S.; Karlisch, P. Computer-aided mechanogenesis of skeletal muscle organs from single cells in vitro. FASEB J. 1991, 5, 2860-2867.
47. Collinsworth, A. M.; Torgan, C. E.; Nagda, S. N.; Rajalingam, R. J.; Kraus, W. E.; Truskey, G. A. Orientation and length of mammalian skeletal myocytes in response to a unidirectional stretch. Cell Tissue Res. 2000, 302, 243-251.
48. Hu, B.; El Haj, A. J.; Dobson, J. Receptor-targeted, magneto-mechanical stimulation of osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2013, 14, 19276-19293.
49. Lambert, C. A.; Colige, A. C.; Munaut, C.; Lapière, C. M.; Nusgens, B. V. Distinct pathways in the over-expression of matrix metalloproteinases in human fibroblasts by relaxation of mechanical tension. Matrix Biol. 2001, 20, 397-408.
50. Gilbert, T. W.; Stewart-Akers, A. M.; Sydeski, J.; Nguyen, T. D.; Badylak, S. F.; Woo, S. L. Gene expression by fibroblasts seeded on small intestinal submucosa and subjected to cyclic stretching. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13, 1313-1323.
51. Ducouret, C.; Petersohn, E.; Betz, N.; Le Moel, A. Fourier transform infrared analysis of heavy ion grafting of poly(vinylidene fluoride). Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 1995, 51, 567-572.
52. Ponomar, M.; Krasnyuk, E.; Butylskii, D.; Nikonenko, V.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, C.; Xu, T.; Pismenskaya, N. Sessile drop method: critical analysis and optimization for measuring the contact angle of an ion-exchange membrane surface. Membranes (Basel). 2022, 12, 765.
53. Huhtamäki, T.; Tian, X.; Korhonen, J. T.; Ras, R. H. A. Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements. Nat Protoc. 2018, 13, 1521-1538.
54. Schneider, C. A.; Rasband, W. S.; Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012, 9, 671-675.
55. Yu, L.; Cai, Y.; Wang, H.; Pan, L.; Li, J.; Chen, S.; Liu, Z.; Han, F.; Li, B. Biomimetic bone regeneration using angle-ply collagen membrane-supported cell sheets subjected to mechanical conditioning. Acta Biomater. 2020, 112, 75-86.
56. Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Yuan, Z.; Chu, G.; Sun, H.; Yu, Z.; Liang, H.; Liu, T.; Zhou, F.; Li, B. Moderate mechanical stimulation rescues degenerative annulus fibrosus by suppressing caveolin-1 mediated pro-inflammatory signaling pathway. Int J Biol Sci. 2021, 17, 1395-1412.
57. Livak, K. J.; Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001, 25, 402-408.
58. National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edition. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
59. Liu, L.; Sheardown, H. Glucose permeable poly (dimethyl siloxane) poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide) interpenetrating networks as ophthalmic biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2005, 26, 233-244.
60. Huang, X.; Das, R.; Patel, A.; Nguyen, T. D. Physical stimulations for bone and cartilage regeneration. Regen Eng Transl Med. 2018, 4, 216-237.
61. Sugiura, S.; Imano, W.; Takagi, T.; Sakai, K.; Kanamori, T. Thermoresponsive protein adsorption of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-modified streptavidin on polydimethylsiloxane microchannel surfaces. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009, 24, 1135-1140.
62. Rim, N. G.; Yih, A.; Hsi, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wong, J. Y. Micropatterned cell sheets as structural building blocks for biomimetic vascular patches. Biomaterials. 2018, 181, 126-139.
63. Kessler, D.; Dethlefsen, S.; Haase, I.; Plomann, M.; Hirche, F.; Krieg, T.; Eckes, B. Fibroblasts in mechanically stressed collagen lattices assume a “synthetic” phenotype. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276, 36575-36585.
64. Zhang, W.; Chu, G.; Wang, H.; Chen, S.; Li, B.; Han, F. Effects of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of multipotent stem cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020, 15, 449-461.
65. Ma, D.; Chen, H.; Shi, D.; Li, Z.; Wang, J. Preparation and characterization of thermo-responsive PDMS surfaces grafted with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) by benzophenone-initiated photopolymerization. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 332, 85-90.
66. Shi, D.; Ma, D.; Dong, F.; Zong, C.; Liu, L.; Shen, D.; Yuan, W.; Tong, X.; Chen, H.; Wang, J. Proliferation and multi-differentiation potentials of human mesenchymal stem cells on thermoresponsive PDMS surfaces grafted with PNIPAAm. Biosci Rep. 2009, 30, 149-158.
67. Nagase, K.; Yamato, M.; Kanazawa, H.; Okano, T. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based thermoresponsive surfaces provide new types of biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2018, 153, 27-48.
68. Humphrey, J. D.; Dufresne, E. R.; Schwartz, M. A. Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 802-812.
69. Hao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jing, D.; Shen, Y.; Tang, G.; Huang, S.; Zhao, Z. Mechanobiology of mesenchymal stem cells: Perspective into mechanical induction of MSC fate. Acta Biomater. 2015, 20, 1-9.
70. Kreutzer, J.; Viehrig, M.; Pölönen, R. P.; Zhao, F.; Ojala, M.; Aalto-Setälä, K.; Kallio, P. Pneumatic unidirectional cell stretching device for mechanobiological studies of cardiomyocytes. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2020, 19, 291-303.
71. Thompson, M. S.; Abercrombie, S. R.; Ott, C. E.; Bieler, F. H.; Duda, G. N.; Ventikos, Y. Quantification and significance of fluid shear stress field in biaxial cell stretching device. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2011, 10, 559-564.
72. Wittkowske, C.; Reilly, G. C.; Lacroix, D.; Perrault, C. M. In vitro bone cell models: impact of fluid shear stress on bone formation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2016, 4, 87.
